Furthermore, we test the robustness of our findings by using the same methods to observe the impact of the cash transfers on household meat consumption. We also show that there is parallel trends in the pre treatment periods for outcome of interest and the common supports are satisfied for propensity scores. The findings are robust for several restrictions on data set. This finding was observed for both rural and urban households. Our findings show that the younger households (with head of household younger than 40) did not consume more tobacco products after the introduction of cash subsidies. Taking advantage of households rotation in the Households' Income and Expenditures Surveys (2010-2012) and exogenous variations in the amount of transfers, this article utilizes a continuous treatment strategy to estimate the impact of the 2010 subsidy reform policy on tobacco consumption in Iran. Some critics argued that instead of using this cash subsidy to buy essentials many low income individuals might spend it on harmful products such as tobacco. The cash transfers amounted to 445,000 Rials (45 USD) per person that were paid to all households that registered for the program. In December 2010, Iran launched a prices subsidy reform package that replaced price subsidies on fossil fuel products and bread with direct cash transfers to households.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |