As a search term, it's quite nonsensical, both because of the internet memes about 50SoG, and because "of" is a word which would appear in very few good search queries. I picked "shades of grey" as example because it went well with my signature. The very existence of adbots makes the latter case much more likely than pure coincidence. Many results have ads and I don't want to get the pages with the only reference to my search term in the ads, but get all the pages with the search term in both the ads and in the page proper. CS Miller ( talk) 11:12, 25 July 2014 (UTC) Reply Thanks, but actually, I'm mostly interested in the "ignore" search which does not exclude the files with both. Note that both representations of 50 have to be separately ignored. I'm not sure of your distinction, but in Google, using -"some phrase", will ignore results containing exactly that phrase, for example searching for -"fifty shades of grey" -"50 shades of grey" shades of grey will ignore references to a certain BDSM-lite book and film. ¡Ouch! ( hurt me / more pain) 08:50, 25 July 2014 (UTC) Reply And again, the signature gained a second meaning. I mean by "ignore", a search like (shades AND of AND grey) but ignore " 50 Shades of Grey" should return most files containing the words "shades", "of", "grey" but only if they are not part of the wording, "50 Shades of Grey".īy "exclude", even a file containing both the wording "50 Shades of Grey" and the individual words outside the context would be excluded.įor example, the article would stay in the "ignore" results, because of the sentence "Not to be confused with Shades of Grey." but get excluded from the "exclude" search results, due to the redirect remark, "(Redirected from 50 Shades of Grey)". Are there search engines which can do both, ignore and exclude?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |